I just watched a bunch of AI Agent demos for automatic market making and automatic voting—so many of them that it was dizzying. But honestly, can those “unexpected” things on-chain really be handed over entirely to machines? For example, if the contract gets hacked, the parameters are set incorrectly, or a DAO suddenly wants to change its governance logic—an AI might not even be able to understand the context, let alone take the blame for people. Anyway, I just feel that the real “failsafe” still needs someone to keep an eye on it—not the kind of all-day order-book watching, but the kind of person who can make a decision and call a stop at critical moments. It’s like how different Layer 2s compete every day on TPS and fees, bickering like elementary school kids arguing about who runs faster; but in the end, users still choose the chain where there’s human warmth in that ecosystem and a real community maintaining it. No matter how fast the machine is, it can’t be faster than human hearts. Forget it, that’s it for now—let’s talk again later.