Just saw someone in the group discussing a royalty dispute—claiming that when royalties are charged in the secondary market, creators “harvest the green crowd.” But the flip side is: without royalties, creators have no way to keep sustaining themselves. Honestly, I don’t think this is so black and white. Looking at on-chain data, it turns out that only a small number of creators truly survive on royalties, while the big players care more about liquidity premiums and narrative packaging. As for that wave of AI agents with automated trading, it actually amplified the security vulnerabilities again—when you look at the flow of funds, it’s all there to see who’s chasing the spotlight and who’s hiding in the shadows. In any case, don’t rush to take sides—see where the money is flowing. It’s more practical than arguing whether royalties should be charged.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned