Recently, I’ve been seeing a lot of big on-chain transfers being interpreted as “smart money.” Honestly though, AI agents are doing similar things too—automatically scanning the chain, catching arbitrage, rebalancing positions, and so on. But the truth is, I think AI agents are still a long way from “being fully self-backed without anyone stepping in.” At least, the traps I’ve run into—like contracts suddenly being upgraded, liquidity pools being targeted, and even gas prices going crazy and causing transactions to get stuck—are things the machine simply won’t judge as “this f*** is wrong; stop right now.” You have to manually shut down the strategy yourself or set an emergency stop-loss.

In any case, it’s the same logic as the way I “grow vegetables”: sowing (deploying), pest control (monitoring), and harvesting (withdrawing). Every step needs someone watching it—otherwise, you won’t even know the crops are being stolen. AI agents can help you with some repetitive work, but when a black swan happens or when there’s abnormal behavior, it still comes down to a human making the call. Put bluntly, it’s just an advanced hoe—not the person who actually farms.