Honestly, the whole address profiling thing keeps looking more and more like a filter. When those on-chain large transfers and hot/cold wallet activity changes are interpreted as “smart money,” my stomach drops—I mean, you never know whether the pile of U behind it is a whale doing arbitrage or money-laundering robots dancing. I tried using a newly activated address to follow the flow of funds, only to find out it may be controlled by a multisig—or it could just be a temporary relay for some Layer-2 bridge. The issue is that labels can tell you what it is, but they rarely tell you why. Is it smart money, or just another piece in a scam? One or two features prove basically nothing. Anyway, when I look at address profiling now, I treat it as a reference—I neither blindly trust it nor completely dismiss it. After all, even bees have to taste the honey themselves to know whether it’s poisonous. Ideally, you should still check the protocol itself and the project team’s transparency; no matter how pretty the on-chain data looks, it’s not as solid as digging through the audit reports multiple times.