Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
I just saw a post about MEV, and I’ve been thinking about it these past few days too. Honestly, when it comes to on-chain “cutting in line,” if we’re talking about fairness, big trades and bots can just run faster—while smaller orders end up suffering worse slippage. I got burned on a swap the other day: I posted my order first, and then I watched someone else take off with the same pool. My execution price ended up 0.3% higher. It’s not that machines are bad—it’s just that who should these ordering privileges actually belong to?
Recently, there’s also been a heated debate about re-staking. People say the “matryoshka” risk is high—but underneath it all, it’s still the same set of orderers fighting over priority. Sharing security is good, sure, but if the underlying rules are even slightly skewed, ordinary users end up being the ones affected “along the way.”
Anyway, my own approach is to use aggregators that can help guard against MEV as much as possible. I don’t really know about the rest—I just feel that even though on-chain transparency is transparency, is it truly transparent down to the ordering details?
Forget it—let’s leave it at that for now.