Just looked at a set of on-chain records where AI agents automatically interacted. The processing speed and fund routing are indeed better than humans. But there’s one step that makes me hesitate a bit—when a contract call involves “judgment” rather than “execution,” such as choosing a royalty standard, or whether liquidity in a certain NFT secondary market needs manual intervention. Logically, you can hard-code it, but market sentiment can’t be hard-coded into something that stays alive—otherwise it turns into a dead pond. In the mirrored-ball reflection, it’s always your own face and your own expression. AI can read the data, but it can’t understand when people might change their minds. So I’ll still go through the fund flow manually to see whether any abnormal addresses are quietly building orders. In the end, no matter how efficient it is, someone still has to watch over that “gray area.” The recent back-and-forth over NFT royalties is actually similar too—once the standard is fixed, the creator’s expectations and the buyer’s psychology can never be fully covered by code.