Hey, I’ve been seeing on-chain data lately that often comes across things like “coincidence transfers.” For example, two wallets with absolutely no relationship swap a little token with each other in the same block, or an address just gets labeled and then “just so” receives a transfer to an exchange. My first reaction used to be, “Something’s going on here.” But if you break down the path, you find out that many cases are simply outdated address labels, CEX consolidation behavior, or an MEV-following smoke screen.



To put it plainly, now that data tools and label systems are criticized for being laggy—and even potentially designed—I think this is, in itself, a probability problem. Do you trust a label as the truth, or do you trust that scripts might fail? In any case, what I’ve run into is most likely not a deliberate conspiracy, but rather what arbitrageurs or market makers do casually. Don’t treat a single transfer as fate—treat it as a sample of noise.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned