Just saw someone hyping “fair ordering” again, and honestly I really want to laugh. As for chain-based queue jumping, put simply, it’s just MEV extraction. The biggest impact isn’t on whales—it’s on those small retail users who patiently wait for block confirmations. You queue up well, and then your spot gets squeezed by a bot’s transaction; your slippage directly wipes out your profit. Orderers are now a black box. Project teams say they’re decentralized, but they secretly change the ordering themselves, and users can’t even find a way to give feedback. On the macro side, rate-cut expectations and risk assets move up and down together—everyone’s betting on liquidity—but unless this on-chain “queue jumping” mechanism is changed, going long is also scary because you might get cut. Anyway, I don’t believe that relying on a “fair” slogan can solve anything. If something isn’t hard-coded in the code, it’s all just nonsense. Forget it—let’s not talk about this for now. See whether the next upgrade can truly make the ordering public.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned