The same AI—why can it, in some people’s hands, move an entire team, while in others’ hands it’s just a toy that can write clunky poems? From what I’ve observed, the gap almost never lies in the AI itself, or in the model. It lies in the people using it. And the difference is in one thing that many people don’t realize: using AI, at its core, is “using people”—using one top-tier talent. Whoever can use top-tier talent will use AI; whoever can’t, no matter how strong the model is, it will be useless.