I just saw a bunch of people again shouting that MEV is unfair and that the sorter should be public—only for them to immediately turn around and go after that “privacy-first” L2. You want their privacy, and they want your liquidity. In the end, everyone still ends up paying miners the toll. Actually, when it comes to on-chain privacy and compliance, ordinary users can hardly have any real expectations—do you really think anonymity equals safety? Don’t be ridiculous. If someone truly wants to track you down, all that separates an address from a face is a single KYC gap. Fairness in ordering? No matter how much retail complains, it won’t help. Market makers and validators are the judges—you’re at most just an audience member. In any case, this is what I’ve figured out: don’t count on privacy to take the hit for you, and don’t assume compliance will keep you fully safe. It’s more practical to keep a close watch on your exit path and the liquidity on the order book.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned