Just saw an AI agent automatically interact on-chain, and the moves were pretty smooth. Then when it hit a certain pool, the slippage blew up and it crashed, and the gas fees burned like crazy. 😅



Honestly, these agents running tasks are indeed fast now, but at the end of the day, someone still needs to watch the critical parts. Especially with those anti-sybil strategies— the more the points-based system gets refined, the more easily robots get marked as “model workers” and then kicked out of the airdrop list if they’re not careful. Task platforms are also getting smarter: if the interaction pattern is even slightly too rigid, they’ll deem it a script, making a lot of “farming” folks work harder than clocking in at a real job.

Anyway, I think let the agent handle whatever it can do. But when it comes to liquidity judgments, exit timing, or even on-chain governance voting—things with a lot of “human touch”—you still need to take a look yourself. Machines can optimize efficiency, but don’t expect them to cover for you.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned