Honestly, modularization is talked about pretty mysteriously in the community—things like data availability, execution splitting, and so on. When I first got into the space, I was also naive and thought that cross-chain in the future would be as smooth as buying water downstairs. Now when I look back, end users basically don’t feel it at all—when you need to cross-chain, you still have to mess with it, and when you need to wait for confirmations, you still wait. Newcomers’ misunderstanding is that “modularization makes things safer and faster.” My take is that “modularization just hides the complexity, but when something goes wrong, it still chokes you.”



Recently, take the cross-chain bridge theft incident and the oracle pricing anomaly—did you actually see the underlying “consensus-waiting” mechanism? Everyone was there hesitating over it. Plain and simple: no matter what modularization is, I only care whether liquidity performance holds up and whether the exit path is still there. As for the rest, that’s it for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned