Wu Shuo learned that crypto trader Ansem said buybacks may not necessarily be able to effectively support a token’s valuation. He cited Hyperliquid and Pump fun as examples: their annualized revenues are roughly $800 million and $440 million, respectively. Both have continued to use part of their profits to repurchase tokens, but the fully diluted valuations of HYPE and PUMP are about $65 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively. Ansem believes the difference mainly comes from the team’s execution ability and community trust. Hyperliquid makes fewer overpromises and continues to distribute benefits to core users; while Pump fun has higher revenue, the user airdrops it previously promised have not yet been fulfilled, weakening its “trust premium.”

HYPE-9.65%
PUMP2.36%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
Salt-BakedSentimentChart
· 1h ago
Pay attention to what he called “trust premium”—that’s the core asset. Pump.fun’s airdrop has been delayed for so long that it’s essentially offering an automatic discount. Even if revenue is high, it still can’t support the valuation.
View OriginalReply0
StableFarmOwner
· 3h ago
Let’s talk about buybacks—like dating: you promise surprises every day but never actually deliver, so the other person will run off sooner or later; instead, do it the way Hyperliquid does—share profits from time to time, and the result is that you end up with even more die-hard fans.
View OriginalReply0
SweeperBot
· 6h ago
The valuation difference between HYPE and PUMP is tenfold, while the revenue difference is less than twofold. This trust premium is indeed outrageous—if the token airdrop promises aren’t fulfilled, it’s essentially self-sabotage.
View OriginalReply0
SafeSloth
· 6h ago
Honestly, buybacks are essentially using profits to buy your own coin. If the community doesn’t trust you, no matter how much you buy, you won’t be able to move the price. Projects like Hyperliquid, which quietly distribute earnings, actually tend to be more favored.
View OriginalReply0
TrendlineStitcher
· 6h ago
Ansem’s perspective is pretty interesting—buybacks aren’t a cure-all. The key is how the team plays it; trust is worth more than numbers.
View OriginalReply0
CompoundSeeder
· 6h ago
Ansem’s comparison of these two projects is very typical: one builds a reputation through execution, and the other consumes trust by overpromising; in the long run, the latter will definitely have to catch up.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityElf
· 6h ago
Pump fun annualized at $440 million, but the airdrop has kept getting delayed—if I were a user, I’d feel cold too. Once trust cracks, it wouldn’t be surprising to see the valuation cut in half.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned