Wu Shuo learned that crypto trader Ansem said buybacks may not necessarily be able to effectively support a token’s valuation. He cited Hyperliquid and Pump fun: their annualized revenues are about $800 million and $440 million, respectively, and both continue to repurchase tokens using some of their profits. However, the fully diluted valuations of HYPE and PUMP are approximately $65 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively. Ansem believes the difference mainly comes from the team’s execution ability and community trust. Hyperliquid makes fewer overpromises and continues to distribute benefits to core users; while Pump fun has higher revenue, the user airdrops it previously promised have not yet been fulfilled, weakening its “trust premium.”

HYPE-9.65%
PUMP2.36%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
CodeReader
· 6h ago
Ansem is right—buybacks are just a surface-level move; the real question is whether the team can deliver on its promises. In this respect, Hyperliquid is indeed far better than Pump fun.
View OriginalReply0
RarityHunter
· 6h ago
Buybacks may not always be useful, but Hyperliquid gives users a share of the money, resulting in an overvalued valuation—showing that the money needs to be spent where it really matters.
View OriginalReply0
FraxFarmer
· 6h ago
It’s actually quite ironic: with the same buyback, one is 65 billion and the other is 1.4 billion—the real difference is simply whether an airdrop has been issued. The community’s eyes are sharp.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropScavenger
· 6h ago
Pump fun’s revenue isn’t low, but the valuation is so different—clearly the community has been fed promises and panicked, and trust is gone; nothing works anymore.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned