Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
ReactBench benchmark AI code generation agents: GPT-5.6 Sol takes first place with 43.1%, while mainstream large models repeatedly step on bug landmines
The Million team, which specializes in developing React-related tools, officially launched “ReactBench v1” recently. It is the first benchmark test specifically for AI coding agents on real-world React development tasks. The test results show that even the best-performing GPT-5.6 Sol has a success rate of only 43.1%. None of the tested models can break the 50% mark, indicating that existing AI still has a considerable gap before it can perfectly replace human developers.
(Background: OpenAI demonstrated GPT-Live’s multi-task ability—while chatting, it can look up flights, weather, and stock prices, and then hand off the problem to GPT-5.5.)
(Background addition: Visa report—AI agent payments have entered a practical stage, and stablecoins are more suitable for high-frequency, small-amount payments.)
Table of contents
Toggle
As AI’s ability to write code continues to strengthen, ensuring the quality of its output has become a key focus for developers worldwide. For React, the currently most popular frontend framework, Million—a well-known open-source team that previously developed React Scan and Million.js—recently officially rolled out a “ReactBench v1” benchmark test. Unlike past standards that only required AI to pass basic unit tests, this test places the AI into the context of real open-source projects, strictly examining whether the code it generates meets production-grade requirements.
Strict validation: not only must it run, but it also must not have bugs
ReactBench v1 selects 51 tasks (Pull Requests) from real open-source projects. The test mainly evaluates two core capabilities: “Write React” and “Fix React.” To prevent AI-generated code that looks viable but hides danger, the test introduces a “React Doctor” validator with more than 400 checking rules, designed to catch potential issues such as invalid renders, poor performance, missing accessibility design, and maintainability problems. The official emphasizes that AI agents not only must complete functionality, but also must not introduce any new code errors.
GPT-5.6 edges out Claude, with overall success rates all below half
Based on the official average pass rate (pass@1), top AI models in the current market still have a lot of room for improvement. GPT-5.6 Sol from OpenAI (Medium / XHigh configuration) took first place with an overall score of 43.1%. Close behind is Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 (XHigh), scoring 41.2%. The official says the gap between the two is small, and it is not yet possible to confirm that Sol has an absolute advantage.
Notably, even the leading models all have success rates below 50%. Data shows that across 4,455 cumulative tests for new-feature development, the models introduced as many as 1,194 React-related issues in total. Of these, 77.5% are serious programming bugs or security issues. In particular, list rendering and the correctness of Hook rules are where models are most likely to fail.
Cost-effectiveness is key—AI-assisted development still carries hidden risks
Despite the strong performance of the top models, there are highlights on the cost side. The report states that GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) scored 38.0%, performing quite close to the top tier. However, when both are set to XHigh, the per-test cost of Fable 5 is about 6.3 times that of Sol. This suggests that for enterprises that need to generate large amounts of code, choosing a mid-tier model may offer excellent cost-effectiveness.
React currently holds about a 70% market share among websites using JavaScript frameworks. Development teams say that if developers blindly trust React code generated by AI, small defects are easy to be amplified in production environments, potentially even causing system crashes, lower conversion rates, and revenue losses. The launch of ReactBench is meant to help developers worldwide keep guard and ensure that future AI agents can truly write high-quality code that is safe, compliant, and efficient.