Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
This time, “Optimus” has kicked a steel plate, and the lawsuit with Apple may take many years to fight.
Apple’s style in court has always been to go hard to the end.
It fought with Samsung in the smartphone patent war from 2011 to 2018; along the way, it even battled all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, and it was only settled seven years later.
And the probability that this case gets dismissed is extremely low.
The materials Apple submitted this time have already far exceeded the threshold for allowing the case to continue being heard. In the complaint, it lists in detail the specific people and actions involved in the alleged theft of trade secrets. The lawsuit filing is 41 pages long.
The litigation process for this type of case is also very complex.
Trade secret cases can’t be simply compared to two products. And since OpenAI’s hardware hasn’t been made public, once the case enters discovery, both sides need to obtain a large amount of internal documents and communications to determine which materials were taken and whether they were used in R&D.
This lawsuit is also colliding with OpenAI’s most important hardware phase. If it drags on for years, it will almost cover the entire product development cycle.
While continuing to develop equipment, OpenAI also has to keep investing time and money to respond in court, and the timeline for going public will add another long-term risk.