Adam Back and Michael Saylor both posted one after another to oppose the BIP110 “fork filtering” proposal

robot
Abstract generation in progress
Golden Finance reported that on July 12, Blockstream CEO Adam Back and Strategy founder Michael Saylor each posted statements opposing the BIP 110 proposal.
Adam Back said that the essence of BIP 110 is an attempt to use consensus-layer measures to constrain others’ behavior, which conflicts with Bitcoin’s core attributes of decentralization and permissionlessness. Bitcoin’s technical consensus mechanism itself is an efficient immune system; any change that has not been rigorously justified by hundreds of developers cannot pass. He called on supporters of BIP 110 to deeply understand Bitcoin’s operating logic rather than creating another fork.
In contrast, Michael Saylor said that BIP 110 upgrades a dispute over spam into a consensus change that could potentially invalidate some currently valid transactions. This precedent itself is the real risk.
BIP 110 is a Bitcoin improvement proposal aimed at modifying the default relay strategy to filter or limit on-chain transactions that embed certain types of data (such as OP_RETURN outputs). Its supporters believe this would help curb the rampant spread of on-chain spam.
BTC-3.10%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned