Wu Shuo learned that Blockstream co-founder and Hashcash inventor Adam Back, along with Strategy founder Michael Saylor, posted messages opposing the implementation of BIP 110 on the Bitcoin network. Adam Back said that BIP 110 attempts to regulate other people’s transactions, violating Bitcoin’s principles of decentralization and permissionlessness, and that forcing it through would only lead to a fork. Michael Saylor added that BIP 110 escalates a spam dispute into a consensus change, invalidating certain valid transactions that paid fees. He believes this precedent is extremely dangerous, and that the community should focus its efforts on addressing more core threats.

BTC-0.29%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
SandwichBlockSam
· 5h ago
BIP 110 sounds like a headache, and another civil war is on the way
View OriginalReply0
LookingAtTheCandlestickChart
· 5h ago
Turning the spam controversy into a consensus-layer change was indeed taking too big a step forward.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullEnjoyer
· 5h ago
Adam Back and Saylor also oppose it at the same time—this signal is strong enough.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ecf4759e
· 5h ago
The community has limited energy—let’s first address custody and the centralized nature of the ETF.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned