Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
ISCV vs. IJJ: Which Value ETF Is the Better Buy Today?
Both the iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV +0.32%) and the iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ +0.49%) take a value approach to investing in U.S. equities -- they just do it with different-sized companies.
ISCV tracks small-cap companies that appear undervalued, while IJJ focuses on mid-sized firms with similar characteristics.
Snapshot (cost & size)
| Metric | ISCV | IJJ | | --- | --- | --- | | Issuer | iShares | iShares | | Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.18% | | 1-year return (as of July 9, 2026) | 24.41% | 16.24% | | Dividend yield | 1.85% | 1.59% | | Beta | 1.02 | 0.96 | | AUM | $685.2 million | $8.7 billion |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-year return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.
ISCV is the cheaper option, with an expense ratio of 0.06% compared to 0.18% for IJJ. ISCV also pays out more to shareholders, with a 1.85% dividend yield compared to IJJ’s 1.59%.
Performance & risk comparison
| Metric | ISCV | IJJ | | --- | --- | --- | | Max drawdown (5 yr) | (25.34%) | (22.67%) | | Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return) | $1,500 | $1,521 |
What's inside
Launched in 2000, IJJ provides targeted exposure to 304 mid-sized companies with undervalued characteristics. Its portfolio tilts toward financial services at 21.8%, industrials at 19.1%, and consumer cyclicals at 14.0%. Its largest positions include US Foods (USFD +1.51%) at 1.3%, TD Synnex (SNX +0.54%) at 1.2%, and Reliance (RS +0.72%) at 1.1%.
ISCV holds a much broader portfolio of 1,051 stocks. Its biggest sector weights include financial services at 22.4%, consumer cyclicals at 14.6%, and industrials at 12.7%. Its top holdings are Host Hotels & Resorts (HST +0.09%) at 0.5%, Jazz Pharmaceuticals (JAZZ 1.25%) at 0.5%, and Aramark (ARMK +0.00%) at 0.5%. ISCV was launched in 2004.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investors
Deciding between these two ETFs really comes down to which slice of the market an investor wants more exposure to -- small-cap or mid-cap.
ISCV's 1,000+ holdings spread risk across a huge swath of small, undervalued companies, and at a 0.06% expense ratio, it's about as cheap as targeted value exposure gets. That combination of low cost and broad diversification is notable: small-cap funds don't always come this inexpensive, and the extra yield (compared to IJJ) is a nice bonus for income-focused investors.
IJJ presents a similar case, but with a little more stability given its mid-cap focus. Mid-cap companies tend to hold up slightly better during volatile periods, which might appeal to investors who don't want the wider swings that typically come with small-cap stocks.
Small-cap value has had a strong run over the past year, and ISCV's outperformance during that stretch is a reminder that smaller companies can help juice returns when conditions favor risk-taking. But on a five-year basis, both funds have performed similarly -- and that’s the more important takeaway for long-term investors. Chasing the better recent return can be tempting, but cost and consistency often matter more than a single strong year.
For investors building a diversified portfolio, there's also a reasonable case for owning both of these funds -- especially for those that might be overweighted toward large caps.