CoinDesk news: Analysts point out that the factors driving Bitcoin’s rise include: 1) ETF stickiness—moderate. Real-time tests show $5.4 billion in outflows since the start of the year; this is the first time there have been net outflows in the first half. About 80% of the peak inflows survived a -54% drawdown. In the past 3 days, a reversal of $510 million occurred; $IBIT led on the second day. 2) Improved clarity—moderate (about 48–50%). Citigroup’s target price is $143k, Standard & Poor’s target price is $150k, both conditional on passing. 3) Deepening traditional finance as collateral—moderate, in upgrade mode. Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and Citigroup are all building Bitcoin ETF/custody/lending independently of clarity. 4) Sovereign allocation—low. Even the most crypto-friendly U.S. government in history still hasn’t been able to break through budget neutrality. 5) Post-quantum upgrade—low, long-term. In the short term, there is no pricing correlation.

BTC1.10%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
GateUser-e3701961
· 6h ago
The quantum upgrade conversation is purely a long-term narrative for now; no one cares about it in the short-term price.
View OriginalReply0
FloatingTeacup
· 12h ago
Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs are secretly setting up custody lending without caring about regulatory clarity—old-money players are actually quietly laying the groundwork.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeesWithAPomeloFlavor
· 12h ago
Citigroup and S&P are betting on 140,000–150k, on the condition that this—doesn’t the 48–50% probability seem a bit too optimistic?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a365d15f
· 12h ago
ETF fund inflows of 510 million indeed show resilience, but the figure of net outflows of 5.4 billion in the first half is also quite eye-catching—do institutions actually believe in it?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned