Caixin reported that in the Lan Tian Ge Rui illegal fund-raising case, 16k Chinese victims pursuing cross-border recovery of approximately 60k BTC in proceeds have seen a key development. The High Court of England held a three-day hearing from July 7 to 9 on the case’s “issues of applicable law.” If the court rules that Chinese law applies, victims may be able to recover only their principal and interest; if it rules that English law applies, victims may have the chance to include the appreciation attributable to Bitcoin’s price rise within the scope of recovery. At present, the final ownership of the case assets still depends on the UK court’s ruling on the applicable law.

BTC-0.33%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • 1
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
OwlMarketMonitoringLamp
· 17h ago
After years of pursuing stolen funds across borders, it’s finally down to the last step.
View OriginalReply0
DaoDoorKeeper
· 18h ago
Whether the increase value portion of 60k BTC can be recovered depends entirely on how the UK court determines the applicable law—this case is too critical.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ae5cc7b3
· 18h ago
Waiting for the result of a July hearing, hoping it won’t get dragged out again.
View OriginalReply0
BlueGlassJelly
· 18h ago
This case has a strong precedent effect, and similar future cross-border crypto asset recoveries will have reference to it.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTailor
· 18h ago
The dispute over which law applies is, at its core, a fight over interests, and British judges face significant pressure.
View OriginalReply0
OrigamiMountainsAndRivers
· 18h ago
16k people have waited for so long, hoping the court will stand with the victims.
View OriginalReply0
AccountantsAlsoGetInto
· 18h ago
BTC has risen so much—if you only get back your original principal using that year’s purchasing power, you’d end up losing big.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned