Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
US Lawmaker Pushes Crypto Developer Protections as Senate Weighs CLARITY Act
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden urged Senate leaders to preserve legal protections for non-custodial blockchain developers in the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, drawing crypto policy support while leaving his final vote on the bill uncertain.
Key Takeaways
Why Is Wyden Pushing to Preserve Developer Protections?
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) sent a letter on July 8 to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) urging them to retain Section 604 of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, in any version of the legislation brought to the Senate floor. The provision was approved by the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee.
Wyden wrote:
The lawmaker argued that developers who publish non-custodial software should not automatically fall under money transmitter regulations when they never take control of customer assets. “Developers who make and release software that allows people to manage their own digital assets – and, critically, where the developer does not control user assets – should not be treated as money transmitters solely because they create or publish software,” he explained.
Why Are Crypto Advocates Supporting the Letter?
The letter drew praise from several crypto policy advocates who view the provision as a safeguard for open-source software development. Peter Van Valkenburgh, executive director of Coin Center, stated on X:
The DeFi Education Fund also thanked Wyden for his “continued advocacy for the BRCA,” highlighting industry support for retaining the developer protection language in the Senate bill.
Alex Thorn, managing director and head of firmwide research at Galaxy Digital, praised Wyden’s support for developers but cautioned that “pro-BRCA does not mean he will vote YES on CLARITY.” Thorn cited Wyden’s previous no votes on the DeFi CRA and GENIUS Act votes, suggesting his developer stance does not guarantee support for the broader bill.
Does Wyden’s Letter Signal Support for the Full CLARITY Act?
Wyden’s letter focuses specifically on preserving Section 604 while maintaining anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism safeguards. He argued that developers involved in illicit activity would not be protected and said the provision would help direct enforcement resources toward criminals and unlicensed money transmitting businesses instead of neutral software developers.
The letter concludes with a direct appeal to Senate leadership as consideration of the legislation continues. The senator concluded:
Whether Section 604 remains in the final Senate version of the CLARITY Act has yet to be determined. Wyden’s position on developer protections is explicit, but his vote on the broader legislation remains an open question based on the information currently available.