The Gate 1.7 million incident seems to be getting more and more interesting... It's like solving a case 😂. Let's see how Gate responds to that surveillance video. Actually, it's very simple: Gate can publicly release those video data with faces blurred, and that would resolve all disputes at once.

The following is from Claude Code:

Based on available materials, the "staged" hypothesis has the following flaws:
1. The facial recognition video is in Gate's hands — if the complainant were a fraudster, Gate could release the video at any time to prove it was him. Gate not releasing it only makes outsiders suspect "Gate is hiding something."
2. The whereabouts of the $1.7 million — this money has already been withdrawn to an address controlled by the complainant. If he were a fraudster, the money is already his; what is the point of "claiming compensation"?
3. Gate's backend data constitutes a complete chain of evidence — public IPs, device fingerprints, facial videos, operation logs — all point to an objective fact. The complainant cannot forge these.
The most reasonable explanation remains:
The complainant did suffer a data leak, and the attacker used the obtained information to gradually bypass Gate's risk control process. Gate's response attempts to use "the process is normal" to cover up system vulnerabilities and refuses to release key evidence (possibly because once released, it would expose more security flaws).
But one point needs to be emphasized: if Gate eventually releases the facial recognition video and it does show the complainant himself, this conclusion would need to be completely overturned. All current analysis is based on "Gate's claims" rather than "verified facts."