7.8

7th board
Hengshang can’t hold on anymore. If there’s negative feedback, see if there are any separated tech categories—prepare for a high-kill.

3rd board
Daheng Technology—if you want it to work, you need to do a good weak-to-strong divergence and separate it once. It’s not clear whether the application recognizes this position.

2nd board
Meishi Technology: node guidance. Daheng or Daming could both be possible.

Weiergao: afraid of heights.

Daming: opening-auction trading tourism guidance. It’s not clear whether this is consumption that will “ferment” later; the attributes are currently mixed. It’s hard to say whether computing power will ferment from Daming, but the quality of the buy orders can only accelerate with a one-character limit-up. Let’s see the T-board test.

Shiyuan: robotics + applications—Daheng has both.

Tianhai: a secondary-new robotics stock.

Jinshi Technology: node guidance.

First board

1. Backflow in the computing-power leasing category; software category responds—there may be a turn toward domestic software.
2. Robotics again.

Plan

1. Check whether there’s a one-character limit-up in the application category, and whether Daheng’s position is recognized. If it’s led by Hong Kong stocks, then with Ali’s these candlesticks—you can’t imagine the sustainability.
2. From 2nd to 3rd board: see what Daming has in mind—hardness is already exceeding the standard.
3. From 1st to 2nd board: Shandong hints are too many... Software should only be a one-character limit-up. I don’t know whether there’s an expectation difference for gold.