Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Bloomberg: US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Stalls as Treasury and Commerce Battle for Control
President Trump’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve has hit a jurisdictional snag, with the Treasury and Commerce departments vying over who should manage the government’s more than 300,000 BTC.
Key Takeaways
A Turf War Inside the Administration
More than a year after President Donald Trump signed a March 2025 executive order creating a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, the project remains unbuilt and two cabinet departments are now fighting over it. The plan originally intended to house the reserve inside the U.S. Treasury Department, but conversations have pivoted to putting it inside the Commerce Department, Bloomberg reported Monday, citing people familiar with the discussions.
The dispute is not just bureaucratic pride, given that a central concern is whether the Treasury Department is legally able to manage the crypto trove at all, a question that has landed with government lawyers. The Justice Department, on the other hand, has said:
White House spokeswoman Liz Huston also highlighted that the administration is still committed to the project, adding:
What the Lawyers Are Untangling
Beyond the question of which department holds the keys, officials are reviewing whether the federal government can legally hold bitcoin for an extended period. Trump’s executive order directs the reserve to retain its bitcoin rather than sell it, but because the asset’s price can rise and fall sharply, officials are examining whether keeping it indefinitely could create legal or operational problems.
The stakes are considerable given the U.S. government holds more than 300,000 BTC, worth roughly $21 billion at current prices, accumulated primarily through criminal and civil asset seizures. The executive order capitalized the reserve with those forfeited coins, deliberately avoiding any taxpayer cost (but it left the operational details, from custody to accounting, for the agencies to work out).
That work is happening under the eye of White House chief crypto adviser Patrick Witt, who has signaled that the reserve’s structure remains under active review. Meanwhile, lawmakers including Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) and Rep. Nick Begich (R-AK) have sponsored legislation to codify the reserve, arguing that an executive order alone can be undone by a future president and that a durable reserve needs an act of Congress.
In any case, the delay is an awkward look for an administration that has made digital assets a signature issue. Trump has repeatedly promised to make America the crypto capital of the world, and said just Monday that China would seize the crypto lead if the U.S. stepped back from the industry.