That blockchain game “production output” model, put plainly, is just a patch game. When the project team realizes the pool is about to be dug out, they rush to patch it—cut rewards, add consumption, and lengthen the lock-up period. While players complain and calculate, they wonder whether this patch can help them get back to even.

The most ridiculous one I’ve seen changed economic parameters four times in half a year, and each time they said it was “for long-term health.” Health may be healthier, but everyone who got in early is buried.

Now with all the new concepts—modularization, the DA layer, and so on—developers chat about them like they’re flying off the charts. I can’t understand any of it, and I don’t plan to. My patch is simple: in blockchain games, my position size must not exceed 5% of my total funds. No matter what it hypes about “sustainable closed-loop,” once the stop-loss line is hit, I’ll execute according to the schedule.

That’s it for now.