CoinWorld news: Michael Saylor said on the X platform that strong consensus is Bitcoin’s immune system. Transaction fees are used to price block space; nodes set policy; miners build blocks; and holders allocate capital. Protocol changes require overwhelming agreement, and bad ideas will fail before they become harmful, interventionist protocol changes.

BTC0.14%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
VinesCoiledIntoGeometricShapes
· 5h ago
Saylor's metaphor is brilliant, the immune system is indeed apt; bad ideas are shot down by consensus before they even land.
View OriginalReply0
PaperSculptureOctopus
· 5h ago
Bad ideas fail before they become intrusive changes — that being said, Bitcoin's conservatism is actually its moat.
View OriginalReply0
MossyLedger
· 5h ago
Many people are not aware that nodes make policies; running a full node is truly voting.
View OriginalReply0
MevStreetPhotographer
· 5h ago
Strong consensus = slow but steady, other chains seek speed and flexibility, Bitcoin seeks to survive the next decade.
View OriginalReply0
LimitOrderAtTheCrater
· 5h ago
Miners build blocks but cannot change the rules; holders have capital but no private keys to move the ledger. This system of checks and balances is executed smoothly.
View OriginalReply0
FlamingoFrontView
· 5h ago
In simple terms, Bitcoin doesn't rely on any single person's authority; it relies on mutual checks and balances among nodes across the entire network, making malicious changes impossible.
View OriginalReply0
ForkingDrama
· 5h ago
Overwhelming consensus is required to change the protocol. This threshold is set high, but it is precisely the reason why Bitcoin has survived to this day.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned