After AI agents truly scale on-chain, the most easily underestimated issue is not payment. If there are trillions of transactions executed by agents in the future, every transaction could potentially have disputes behind it.

Was the task actually completed?
Is the delivery quality considered qualified?
How should promises in natural language be interpreted?
Who decides which side is more reasonable?
//
Traditional smart contracts are good at executing clear rules, but they are not good at handling ambiguous semantics and real-world evidence.
This is what @GenLayer does, and it is also one of the most anticipated AI x Crypto ecosystems. It is backed by institutions such as North Island Ventures, Arrington Capital, Node Capital, and Maelstrom, with over $10 million in funding, and is about to have its token TGE.
Simply put, GenLayer is the adjudication layer of the agentic economy, that is, the arbitration layer prepared for AI agents.
Let multiple independent AI validators judge separately like a jury, and then give a credible result through consensus.
//
And @RallyOnChain is the first flagship protocol built on GenLayer. Participating in Rally early is equivalent to participating in GenLayer early, which means getting their $RLP tokens early.
Anyway, it's all free, so you might as well join. I see many people have already received a lot of RLP.
Currently, they have an event with a prize pool of @GenLayer worth 5000 $USDC , welcome everyone to participate.
Link: