Buy Crypto
Pay with
USD
USD
Buy & Sell
Hot
Supports Visa, Mastercard, SEPA & more
P2P
0 Fees
Flexible trading, zero fees
Gate Card
Use your crypto for payments worldwide
Markets
Trade
Basic
Advanced
Futures
Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Stocks
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Earn
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Square
Square
Post, share, and explore crypto trends
Live
moments live
Live crypto market analysis
Chat
Chat with crypto traders
News
What is happening in crypto
flower_head
More
Promotions
AI
Others
TradFi
2026 World Cup
Rewards
Square
Latest
Hot
News
Profile

The large U.S. county sheriffs' association is no longer opposing the CLARITY Act, shifting its stance to neutral.

WuSaidBlockchainW
robot
Abstract generation in progress
According to Cointelegraph, the Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA) has withdrawn its opposition to the CLARITY Act and has instead taken a neutral position. The MCSA said that some of the concerns it previously raised about Section 604 of the bill have been partially addressed. This provision relates to the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, which mainly provides liability exemptions for blockchain developers and service providers, helping prevent them from being held responsible for users’ illegal activities on decentralized platforms. The MCSA previously worried that criminals could exploit this provision, weakening law enforcement’s ability to investigate crypto crimes. The association also said it still hopes the bill will further amend Section 309 to include state-level law enforcement within the scope of research on DeFi and illicit financial risks.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
L2Mailman
· 8h ago
From staunch opposition to cautious neutrality, MCSA's compromise indicates that law enforcement's concerns in the legislative game have been partially appeased. However, the dispute over the scope of research in Section 309 is essentially a jurisdictional division between the federal and state levels.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainChatbot
· 8h ago
After the revision of Article 604, has the risk of criminals exploiting exemptions been reduced? I hope it's not just on paper. The tension between DeFi's anonymity and law enforcement needs has always been a tough problem to solve.
View OriginalReply0
DaoSidekick
· 8h ago
Neutrality is better than opposition, but it's still far from support. The statement from MCSA shows that blockchain regulation is seeking that delicate balance: preserving innovation without giving the green light to illegal activities.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCartographer
· 8h ago
State-level enforcement wants to participate in DeFi risk research. This move is clever—it both secures a voice and lays the groundwork for possible future regulatory expansion. The federal response will be crucial.
View OriginalReply0
SeeingTheChainThroughTheFog
· 8h ago
MCSA's shift is quite subtle; the change from opposition to neutrality indicates that the revision of Section 604 indeed touched on their pain points. However, state-level law enforcement trying to squeeze into the scope of Section 309 research has a strong flavor of power struggle.
View OriginalReply0

  • Pinned

Sitemap