Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
These past few days while watching the charts and placing orders, I noticed that during certain periods, the depth of BTC/USD1 actually looks more solid than BTC/USDC. Especially at several key price levels, I often see multiple large orders sitting there, with relatively thick support on both the buy and sell sides.
On the other hand, for BTC/USDC, many price levels are still dominated by smaller orders, and the order book continuity is weaker. This difference isn't just about how the page looks—you can really feel it when placing actual orders. Whether the depth is sufficient, how big the slippage is, and whether execution is smooth all matter quite a bit for users trading contracts.
Where USD1 is currently competitive is, first, the very low spread, and second, zero maker fees.
Combined, these two factors give a clear cost advantage to people who like to place limit orders, run strategies, do grid trading, or engage in short-term trading. A lot of the time, trading isn't just about getting the direction right—execution cost also matters. Lower fees and less slippage, over time, have a non-trivial impact on trading experience and strategy outcomes.
Now, when looking at USD1, I don't just see it as a stablecoin for yield farming anymore. It's moving toward the trading side, and in certain time periods, the order book performance of BTC/USD1 can already be compared with mainstream settlement pairs.
Whether a stablecoin can truly succeed depends not only on its issuance volume but also on whether traders are willing to use it for pricing, settlement, placing orders, and running strategies.
As it stands, USD1's competitiveness on the trading side is gradually becoming apparent: low fees, tight spreads, and its depth is steadily catching up—all of these are tangible experience advantages.
Of course, order book depth is dynamic and varies across different time periods, so you can't draw conclusions just from one snapshot. But BTC/USD1 is definitely a trading pair worth adding to your watchlist.
Sometimes the real edge isn't necessarily a more aggressive directional call, but lower trading friction and a more stable execution experience.
BTC/USD1 contract experience:
#DYOR