Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
The foundation laid off 20% of its staff, yet institutions rushed in to buy the dip—which one do you believe?
On one hand, 54 people were laid off and 40% of the budget was cut. On the other hand, $7.85 million was spent to buy ETH.
Both happened on the same day. Tell me—is this bearish or bullish?
① First, let's talk about what happened.
On June 23, the Ethereum Foundation officially announced a restructuring—54 layoffs, about 20% of its employees, and a 40% budget cut for 2026. The foundation was split into five clusters, shifting from "active builders" to "lightweight protocol governance and maintainers."
In plain English: The foundation stops working and just keeps an eye on things.
On the same day, five former foundation senior researchers established an independent nonprofit called Ethlabs, funded by BitMine and SharpLink.
Then today, SharpLink—that Nasdaq-listed Ethereum treasury company—resumed accumulation for the first time in eight months, buying 5,000 ETH from FalconX, worth $7.85 million.
Now SharpLink holds 876k ETH, worth $1.37 billion.
But note—their average cost is $3,609. Currently they are underwater by $876k, a loss of 56%.
What does that mean?
A listed company trapped 56% deep, losing nearly $1.8 billion, and at this level, they bought again.
② So, what exactly are institutions buying?
Many say: The foundation is laying off staff, the R&D roadmap is doomed, ETH is going to crash.
SharpLink says: I'm buying.
The question is—can these two logics coexist long-term?
My answer is: Yes. And they must.
Because institutions aren't buying the "foundation's research capability."
Institutions are buying ETH's financial asset properties.
Ethlabs's positioning is clear—not about writing cryptography papers, but about institutional on-chain, financial asset issuance, cross-chain trading, mainnet capacity, and ETH's monetary properties.
In plain English: Don't talk about tech ideals, just talk about how money flows.
SharpLink's CEO said: "We are at the beginning of an Ethereum institutional super cycle."
Listen—this isn't betting on what Vitalik's next blog post says. This is betting on which chain the world's money will flow to.
③ But here's a painful fact
ETH is priced at about $1,510.
That's down nearly 70% from its 2021 all-time high of $4,946.
SharpLink's average cost is $3,609, underwater by 56%.
Whales have accumulated 350k ETH in the past five days, worth about $617 million. Yet the price is still falling.
Institutions are buying, but the price is dropping.
What does that tell us?
It means institutions' money isn't here to pump. It's here to build positions.
They don't care if it's $1,500 or $1,600. They care about whether, in 3 or 5 years, ETH will be the underlying network for global financial asset settlement.
And you? You're staring at the 15-minute K-line, anxious about whether to cut losses.
④ How do these two logics coexist?
Foundation scales back R&D → short-term community panic, price under pressure.
Institutions contrarian accumulation → long-term bet on ETH financialization, bottom fishing.
These two things are not contradictory at all.
The foundation steps back because it was never supposed to be "Ethereum's R&D department." Ethereum is a decentralized network, not a company. The foundation is just one organization in the ecosystem, not the boss.
Ethlabs emerges because institutions need an execution layer that can handle settlement speed, cross-chain interoperability, and asset issuance—not an idealistic lab writing whitepapers.
Ethereum is transforming from "Vitalik's vision" to "institutional infrastructure."
Short-term, this is painful for the price. Long-term? You decide.
"The foundation lays off staff, the community cries; institutions buy the dip, smart money laughs."
"You worry about 'who's still doing R&D,' institutions worry about 'where else can money go.'"
"If someone trapped 56% deep isn't panicking, why are you?"
"ETH's biggest bearish factor is that it's still living in the 2021 narrative. Its biggest bullish factor is that it's becoming the infrastructure of 2026."#0成本拿2股SK海力士 #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 #美国5月PCE通胀升至4.1%创三年新高 $BTC $ETH $SOL