Vance's model of national shareholding plus union negotiations sounds like putting a bridle on the AI era, but it's hard to say who actually holds the reins.

View Original
CoinNetwork
Vance argues for the government to take an equity stake in AI giants, while Musk publicly pushes back: instead, send money directly to the public— the future is a major deflation.
Vice President Vance argues for setting up a sovereign wealth fund through national shareholding, and for introducing union collective bargaining—so that workers get a share at the decision-making table—preventing large-model companies from becoming cross-trillion-dollar, unconstrained monopolies. Musk, meanwhile, proposes a plan in which the Treasury directly issues funds to the public, arguing that with AI and robots driving output growth, production growth will outpace the money supply; direct cash payments will not be inflationary, and could even counter even a major deflationary spiral. The core disagreement is over wealth inequality: Vance favors state intervention and worker participation, while Musk favors direct intervention at the level of monetary policy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned