HyperEVM is criticized for positional bias and insufficient developer experience, with core applications still limited to a few scenarios

robot
Abstract generation in progress
Golden Finance reports that the Hyperliquid community has erupted in controversy over the positioning of HyperEVM, believing that HyperEVM is not designed as a general-purpose Ethereum execution environment, but rather as a dedicated execution layer more suited for combined interactions with Hypercore. The core design should rely on corewriter and pre-compiled contracts, rather than being used as a general L1. However, the current high learning curve for developers and complex system address interactions lead to cross-asset operations requiring multiple transactions, resulting in low efficiency. In most cases, asset exchanges are even less efficient than AMM mechanisms.
Additionally, HyperEVM has long suffered from an "neglected" issue, possibly because the team’s resources are concentrated on core products like HIP-3, HIP-4, and pooled collateral, leading to insufficient investment in ecosystem development. The community suggests that to boost HyperEVM’s ecosystem activity, it is necessary to improve developer tools, optimize the corewriter mechanism, and incentivize more on-chain experimental applications similar to DeFi Summer, otherwise smart contract innovation may continue to slow down.
HYPE4.39%
ETH1.04%
L18.89%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned