I am extremely opposed to the so-called "long-termism."

Long-termism has never been a value system; it is a threshold.
Now it’s being turned into a political correctness.
Short-term is considered impulsive; long-term is seen as the high-level correct approach.
The real world is not like that at all.
Holding uncertain income, caring for the elderly and children, facing various unpredictable risks—what right do you have to pursue long-termism?
He holds BTC for 10 years, but the point isn’t the 10 years; it’s that he has the qualification to hold for 10 years.
What is truly underestimated is "survivalism."
Only by surviving first can you have the qualification to talk about long-termism.
Long-termism has an extremely high threshold.
If you have A8, A9, and persist for 5 or 10 years, that’s fine;
If you’re carrying a mortgage, car loan, and other debts, and talk about 10 years, you’re really sick.
The biggest prerequisite for long-termism is not faith or cognition, but survival.
Only if you have enough resources and the ability to hedge against life's unpredictable risks do you qualify to discuss long-termism.
Before you have the qualification to pursue long-termism, what you need is survivalism and opportunism.
First, ensure you can survive; then, when a window of opportunity appears, go all out and make a risk leap.
Only then do you start to have the qualification ticket for long-termism.