Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Bitmine's target of controlling 5% of $ETH supply is almost done thanks to simple buy pressure.
BMNR traded at a premium, they issued stock, bought ETH, ETH went up, the treasury got bigger, and the equity market gave them more room to issue again.
That flywheel only works when the stock trades above NAV. But @fundstrat is in trouble:
– BMNR is at ~1.0x mNAV
– holding 5.3M ETH
– ~$10B unrealized loss
– cost basis around $3.8K while spot is around $1.7K
@BitMNR raised around $274M net through BMNP, paying a 9.5% dividend on $350M of stated value.
On paper, that's fine because the ETH stack actually earns yield.
They have 4.7M ETH staked, with staking yield around 3%, which can generate something like $230M+ annualized if the whole system keeps running.
That's the key difference vs Strategy. Bitmine can probably pay the preferred dividend.
But can they keep growing ETH per share when the stock no longer trades at a fat premium?
If BMNR sits below NAV, issuing common stock becomes dilutive.
If ETH keeps bleeding, BMNR gets weaker, the premium disappears, the capital window closes, buying slows, and ETH loses one of its biggest marginal buyers.
No forced selling needed. Sometimes the bid disappearing is enough.
Because Bitmine might reach 5% this year, then what? Do they keep aping ETH with 9.5% preferred stock while ETH staking only yields 3%?
Probably not forever.
They can sustain the structure, but not the same aggressive accumulation pace unless ETH rebounds or BMNR gets its premium back.
→ Best case: Bitmine reaches 5%, turns into an ETH staking infrastructure company around MAVAN, and lets the treasury sit there farming yield.
→ Worst case: ETH nukes lower, BMNR loses index support, the preferred market freezes, and every ETH treasury with a weak capital structure turns into a zombie vehicle.
Btw, we need the next giga buyer to save them, and maybe this whole industry. How?
– ETH ETFs are the swing buyer with $13.68B AUM. Staking-enabled ETFs could unlock demand by turning ETH into a yield-bearing institutional asset.
– If the staking ratio moves toward 40%, another 9M ETH could be absorbed over time, which is a bigger number than Bitmine.
– The Ethereum ecosystem needs a huge narrative to bring retail attention back. Then ETH could pump because it's still the settlement layer underneath everything.
– Ethereum itself needs to capture more value and revenue.
I think Bitmine can sustain itself through 2026 and finish the 5% target because staking income covers the preferred dividend and the remaining gap isn't impossible.
But the aggressive accumulation strategy is in its final innings unless BMNR gets its premium back.
After that, ETH needs to graduate from one treasury buyer to many structural buyers.
The next bid has to be the network itself.