I'm starting to document which chain and which contracts these "parallel/sharding" narratives actually land on, not to appear knowledgeable, but because when there's a buzz, it's easy to overlook the two most basic things: where the assets are actually held in custody, and whether you can exit smoothly when you want to. The governance posts are full of fancy budget descriptions, but what really keeps me awake are who holds the multi-signature permissions, emergency switches, and upgrade rights. Recently, the on-chain data tools and tagging systems have also been criticized as "lagging/misleading," which further proves not to trust dashboards too much. Instead, look through a few more transactions and check the permission structures yourself, at least to have a clear idea: where to run before something goes wrong, and if you can't escape, don't pretend there's no risk. That's all for now.