Right now, the scoring systems on these task platforms really feel like clocking in to work: interact today, forward tomorrow, recruit the day after—and if you’re not careful, you’ll even get labeled a “witch.” Put in half a month of effort, and with just one “suspected anomaly,” it’s cut off and zeroed out immediately. Plainly speaking, many people aren’t just “fishing for rewards”—they’re exchanging their emotions for uncertainty, and they still have to be dragged around by KPIs.

I see the group arguing again about whether extreme funding rates mean a reversal or just continue squeezing the bubble… Don’t rush to bet on the plot. Even if the funding rate gets ridiculously exaggerated, it doesn’t mean “this round is guaranteed to win.” My own boundary is: my energy is limited, and for projects with unclear rules, I’d rather miss out. If I really do it, I do it by office standards—record everything, budget your time, and set a stop-loss (it’s a stop-loss, not stubbornly hard-holding). I don’t need you to understand me, but I also don’t want to keep watching you repeatedly send yourselves into a liquidation-blow-up cycle.