Lately, AI Agents have made me a bit itchy too, mainly because of that fantasy of "letting it handle the process for me, so I don't have to watch the market constantly," in other words, wanting to be lazy but still maintain a sense of control. But when it comes to on-chain interactions, there are still a few steps I don't dare to fully let go of: signing/authorization—no matter how smart the Agent is, it can't prevent you from making a mistake and granting unlimited permissions; also cross-chain and routing switches—when facing congestion, reorganization, or block delays, it's easiest for it to shift from "automation" to "automated head-sending." Then there's the testnet incentives and point expectations... Everyone in the group is guessing whether the mainnet will issue tokens, and the Agent can easily be led astray by your "more interactions, more rewards" setup, ending up with a bunch of useless interactions and strange address profiling. Anyway, my current approach is: let it help me spot opportunities and calculate paths, but when it comes to signing, changing permissions, or increasing limits, I handle it myself—if it's slow, so be it.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned