I’ve been lurking in the group for a long time, and today I saw someone ask again, “Will stablecoins lose their peg?” I just can’t help but say a couple of things… To put it simply, losing the peg is often not a technical issue—it’s a psychology of redemption runs. Once you start to doubt that the reserves are unclear or that redemptions are running slowly, everyone will try to be the first to leave. And when enough people run, it really becomes a problem.



On reserve transparency, don’t just look at the project team’s PDF. It’s best to be able to see audit-able on-chain/custodial account traces—especially whatever reconciliation evidence is available. Even if it’s not perfect, it’s still better than “trust me.”

Also, I’ve been feeling the same way about the recent complaints that on-chain data tools and tagging systems are lagging. Once the tags mislead, it’s very easy for the whole emotional narrative to get steered off course… Personally, I spread my own small funds out and keep a bit of on-chain liquidity as an “escape hatch.” In any case, don’t treat stablecoins as absolutely stable—that’s the takeaway.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned