Lately, dealing with multi-chain wallets has gotten a bit overwhelming. Your assets are like loose change scattered across different drawers—then you tap through a bunch of networks and still have to confirm whether it’s the same-name token on the same chain. To be blunt, fragmentation isn’t the problem; the real issue is that you don’t have a mental “map” of where exactly you are. Modularization and the current wave of DA-layer development have developers pretty excited, but users (including me) often end up completely confused: bridges, rollups, DA—then once it finally lands in the wallet, it just means more entry points.

So I’m forcing myself to simplify: keep only two or three wallets for everyday use, grouped by “purpose” (long-term, interaction, testing). Every time I cross chains, I jot it down in a small table—nothing perfect, but traceable. And one more reminder to myself: I treat simplicity as a trap— the more “one-click” the interface is, the more likely it is to hide costs and risks. For now, that’s it. Slowly getting the structure sorted out is more reliable than chasing new features.