These days, there's again debate about whether to enforce royalties in the secondary market.


It feels a bit like they're fighting over the steering wheel: creators want cash flow, traders want lower friction and more transactions, platforms want activity.
Honestly, royalties are not a moral issue, but a security issue—if the income expectations disappear, creators will find other ways to compensate, such as releasing more series, doing more aggressive pre-sales, or even embedding permissions into smart contracts, and in the end, the risk is still borne by the buyer.

By the way, I see outside interpretations tying ETF capital flows, U.S. stock market risk appetite, and crypto market rises and falls together.
While it's lively, I still only focus on the checklist: can the contract be changed at any time, who enforces the royalty rules, can secondary sales be bypassed, and is there an exit mechanism for community commitments.
Survive first, then talk about profits.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned