Recently, I've been looking at various explanations of "modularization," and honestly, the biggest changes for end users might be twofold: first, crossing between different chains more frequently, with more and more chains in their wallets; second, the experience is increasingly focused on "front-end + routing," where a single click actually involves several layers working together to assemble settlements and data. Of course, there are benefits—lower costs, more choices—but the downsides are also very real: when something goes wrong, you don't know which link is at fault, and with governance proposals full of "modules" being dismantled, the boundaries of responsibility become blurred.



These days, social mining and fan tokens are heating up again. I'm a bit skeptical that "attention equals mining" is just shifting product issues onto incentive mechanisms... Anyway, after lowering my expectations, I feel more relaxed: as long as I can stabilize the basic pathways and clearly explain bad debt and risk control, I’m willing to support with my vote; the rest of the hype, let it be.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments