Actually, everyone understands that DAO voting is often not "democracy," but "whoever gets incentives has the loudest voice."

Last night, I looked at a proposal, and the title sounded like a public service ad.
When I opened it: voting for you to get airdrops/subsidies, those who didn't vote are considered nonexistent;
even more harshly, someone casually changed a multi-signature seat, directly replacing the power structure, and still claimed it was "governance optimization"...
Anyway, I automatically assume there's a scam whenever I see this kind of thing, and I’d rather not participate than be a tool.
By the way, recently, social mining and fan token schemes—those "attention is mining" ideas—are basically just using your screen time as voting chips.
It’s lively, but who will actually take the final step?
I'll first finish the stop-loss and permission checks; the rest is up to fate.