Lately I've been looking at addresses with "tags/clusters/funding flows," basically like drawing a flight path for a spaceship: looks nice, but don't take it as absolute truth. Clustering algorithms can group a bunch of addresses into a "person," but there are exchange hot wallets, cross-chain bridges, and possibly malicious mixers involved, so you might think a line represents a whale swimming around, but it could just be a pipeline exchanging water... I now mostly treat it as a probability hint: only when the same behavior repeats does it count, and single anomalies are just ignored for now.

My colleagues also ask me, "Is someone accumulating?" I can only say I don't know either, just watch the on-chain deposit and withdrawal rhythm + timing, don't be scared by a single tag. Recently, that main public chain is upgrading/maintaining, and everyone in the group is guessing whether the ecosystem will migrate. I'm more concerned about whether the net flow of the bridges and active addresses before and after the upgrade are "overall moving," rather than who posted a tweet. Anyway, data can serve as a star map, but execution still depends on yourself—don't get carried away.