Recently, everyone has been hyping up AI Agents for on-chain automation, saying they can help you monitor positions, swap tokens, run strategies, and so on... I believe they can "get the job done," but I don't believe they can "take the blame." Frankly, there are still many parts that truly require human oversight: how much permission to grant, whether to whitelist certain contracts, whether to stop when encountering strange approve or proxy contracts—these are not issues that a model's simple "looks fine" can solve.



And then there are details like unlocking timing and team wallet transfers. Agents can catch these, but you have to decide how to interpret them; otherwise, if it treats "slow selling" as "normal operation," you'll end up replicating my past rug experience... Modular, DeFi-layer development teams keep talking more and more enthusiastically, while users are often confused, making it easier for Agents to be led by the narrative.

My current redundancy approach is like a "backup": no matter how smart, you still need a manual confirmation, a limit layer, and a switch to cut off the internet at any time. Anyway, those who have lost money before know that being cautious isn't shameful.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned