Recently, on the blockchain, people keep saying "another coincidental transfer," which looks like a script, but in fact, most of the time there are logical reasons: A first withdraws to a new address from the exchange, after a couple of hops it goes into an aggregator/cross-chain bridge, then lands and is split into a bunch of small accounts, and finally some of them flow back into the same market-making/lending pool... Basically, it's about hiding the path, not necessarily a conspiracy. Now, with funding rates being extremely volatile, people in the group are arguing whether to reverse the trend or continue squeezing the bubble. I actually prefer to watch where these transfers are going—whether it's to leverage up, hedge, or repay debts, the intent is quite different. A colleague just glanced and said, "Isn't this money laundering?" I didn't bother to argue, just tightening my reach a bit—being neutral when possible, to avoid being driven by emotions.