Just now, I came across a few new PFP projects, and they’re all talking about “membership benefits + brand co-creation.” It sounds pretty great, but I’m a little stuck right now. To put it plainly, if PFPs really turn into membership cards, the key isn’t whether the avatar looks better—it’s whether governance and incentives actually hold up: Are the benefits sustainable, are the boundaries between the team and the community clear, how the budget is spent, and who is overseeing it.



Recently, during the airdrop season, the task platforms have been flooded with anti-bot/anti-witch rules, and the points system has turned reward-chasers who try to farm points into something like clocking in at work… This kind of attention-driven setup is lively in the short term, but in the long run, it comes down to whether anyone is willing to stay to vote, make proposals, argue, and still keep contributing. Anyway, I’d rather slow down for now—first look at the fine print and the incentive structure. A good-looking avatar doesn’t necessarily mean it’s worth anything.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned