Recently, there's been a lot of talk about "parallel" and "sharding" narratives, and the scene is quite lively, but honestly, I'm more concerned about two things: where to securely store assets, and how to withdraw them if something really happens. No matter how good the technical story is, one failure in execution details is enough for you to remember for a long time.

And also, on-chain data tools and tagging systems have recently been criticized for being outdated or misleading, which I can understand... Everyone is too focused on "who bought and who sold" labels, but once the address changes or there's a layer of intermediary, everything gets distorted. Anyway, my current redundancy approach is more like "backup": don't rely on a single perspective for judgment, look at multiple entry points, go through the exit path in advance, to avoid having to argue principles in the voting area later, and be educated in your wallet first.