Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Recently, I’ve been getting itchy again with LST/re-staking, honestly just because seeing the words “more layers of yield” makes it easy to overestimate my ability to exit quickly.
Where does the yield come from? Either someone pays real fees (protocol charges, MEV sharing, service fees), or it’s subsidies + re-packaging, changing the name to keep issuing tokens as cash flow.
The risks are pretty straightforward: the underlying staking already has penalties/delayed withdrawals, re-staking sells the same collateral to more people, and if something goes wrong, it’s a compounded explosion—being “just holding LSTs” might not even be innocent.
Now, with modular and DAO layer narratives making developers excited, users are confused, but ultimately, whether it’s about “who’s paying” can be seen through in a glance.
Anyway, I’m not taking sides, just watching to see when someone truly dares to press the button.