Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Strategy Bitcoin sale timing triggers Polymarket settlement controversy, with related market trading volume exceeding $75 million
Mars Finance news: On June 2, Strategy disclosed that it sold 32 BTC last week, triggering a settlement dispute on a Polymarket prediction market with trading volume exceeding $75 million. The market is: Will Strategy sell any Bitcoin before May 31? Traders can choose “Yes” or “No.” On Monday, Strategy disclosed in a filing to the SEC that the company sold 32 BTC between May 26 and May 31, generating proceeds of about $2.5 million to support allocations related to its preferred stock issuance. This is Strategy’s first disclosure of selling Bitcoin since December 2022.
Traders who support a “Yes” settlement believe the SEC filing clearly shows the sale occurred before the deadline; traders who support a “No” settlement argue that the relevant information was not yet publicly available when the market closed, and therefore it should be settled as “No.” The market had previously settled as “No” twice and has received two objections, and is currently in the final review stage. Polymarket later added a note on the page stating that “confirmations obtained outside the market time frame do not qualify,” which appears to favor a “No” settlement. Disputes of this kind have long been a recurring challenge for prediction market platforms—how to determine the standard for judging the outcome, whether it is based on when the event occurred or on when evidence of the event is made public.